11 September 2026 · 5 min read
Why automatic cropping cuts people's heads off
Going from a wide frame to a vertical one means deleting most of the picture. Why the naive approaches fail, what speaker tracking has to get right, and how to spot a bad reframe.
A 16:9 frame turned into 9:16 keeps about a third of its width. Something has to be thrown away, and which third you keep is a decision that gets made on every single frame.
The centre crop
The simplest approach keeps the middle and discards the sides. It works perfectly when the subject is centred and fails completely when they are not — and in most recorded conversations, nobody is centred. Two people sitting either side of a table both end up half out of frame, with the empty space between them filling the screen.
Face detection, and why it is not enough
The next approach finds faces and crops to one. Better, but it introduces a new failure: with two faces in shot, something has to choose. Choose wrong and the frame sits on the listener while the speaker talks off-screen. Choose by size or position and it will get it wrong whenever the camera setup is asymmetric.
The frame has to follow whoever is speaking, which means the crop decision depends on the audio, not only the picture.
The drift problem
Even with the right subject, a crop that follows a face continuously produces a picture that sways gently for the entire clip, because people move their heads while talking. It reads as a camera operator who has had too much coffee, and it is tiring to watch.
A better behaviour is to hold still and cut. Stay on one framing while a person is speaking, then cut cleanly to the other when the speaker changes. That is how an editor would do it, and it is invisible in a way that continuous tracking never is.
Good reframing looks like nothing. If you notice the crop moving, it is wrong.
How to check a tool in thirty seconds
- Find a clip where the two people interrupt each other. Watch whether the frame keeps up or lags behind.
- Watch a clip with the sound off and see whether you can tell who is speaking from the framing alone.
- Look at the edges. Heads cut at the crown, or chins at the bottom of frame, mean the crop is following a box rather than a person.
When to give up on vertical
Some shots cannot be cropped. A wide three-person panel, a whiteboard, a gameplay capture with information in the corners. Forcing those into 9:16 produces something worse than not posting. Square is often the compromise that keeps the clip usable.
Keptbits cuts on sentence boundaries.
Paste a link or upload an episode, say how many clips you want, and get them back captioned and vertical. Seven days free on any plan.
Start your free trialRead next
9:16, 1:1 or 16:9: which ratio for which platform
Three shapes, and the choice is less about platform rules than about how much of the frame you are willing to throw away. A practical guide to picking one.
Clipping a conversation with two people in it
Interviews produce the best clips and are the hardest to cut. Where the boundaries go, what to do about interruptions, and why the question usually belongs in the clip.
What to compare when you are choosing a clipping tool
Every clipping tool claims to find the best moments. The differences that actually change your output are in four places, and pricing is only one of them.